• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to footer
information matters logo

Information Matters - Agentic AI News and Market Forecasts

The Agentic AI Revolution: what it means for business and the rules of competition

  • Home
  • About
    • The Team
    • About Us
    • Our Methodology
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Downloads
  • Agentic AI Company Tracker
  • Agentic AI Sector Analysis

1X Technologies

COMPANY PAGE

1X Technologies

Norwegian-American humanoid-robotics (HQ Palo Alto, manufacturing Moss Norway and Hayward California) company building general-purpose home and commercial robots — NEO (the $20,000 home humanoid) and EVE (commercial humanoid); backed by OpenAI’s Startup Fund and Samsung, with a December 2025 EQT strategic partnership deploying up to 10,000 humanoid robots across EQT’s global portfolio companies.

Founded 2014
Private — Series B+
Horizontal AI Applications
1x.tech

Last Updated: 28 May 2026
Fact-checked: 2 June 2026
Coverage: Tracker · Category Report (Horizontal AI Applications, forthcoming)
← Back to AI Tracker

The Business

1X Technologies is a Norwegian-American humanoid-robotics (HQ Palo Alto, manufacturing Moss Norway and Hayward California) company building general-purpose home and commercial humanoid robots — NEO (the $20,000 home humanoid opened for pre-orders October 28, 2025) and EVE (commercial humanoid). Founded in 2014 by Norwegian roboticist Bernt Øivind Børnich (originally as Halodi Robotics, rebranded 1X in 2022), the company is anchored by the OpenAI Startup Fund as a principal strategic investor and has raised cumulatively approximately $125M+ in confirmed capital through the 2024 $100M round from EQT Ventures and Samsung. In September 2025, Tech Startups and Sifted reported 1X was raising up to $1B at a $10B valuation, more than twelve times the prior valuation; that round had not closed at time of writing per public sources. In December 2025, 1X announced a strategic partnership with EQT to make up to 10,000 humanoid robots available to EQT’s global portfolio companies — the principal commercial-channel signal across the post-2024 cycle. NEO deliveries are planned for 2026, with the early launch coverage emphasising the teleoperation-required “human in the loop” feature that operates households remotely.

Customers and Distribution

1X’s distribution sits across two principal motions: the consumer-home NEO channel (pre-orders opened October 28, 2025 at $20,000 per unit with 2026 deliveries) and the commercial-deployment EVE channel anchored by the December 2025 EQT strategic partnership (up to 10,000 humanoid robots across EQT’s global portfolio companies). Named customer disclosures are concentrated in the EQT partnership announcement at this stage; the consumer NEO pre-order base is private. The P3c GTM-maturity sub-rubric was held at 7 in the v1.6ep pass on the EQT commercial-channel signal and the NEO pre-order traction; the P1d time-to-revenue sub-rubric was held at 7 on the 2026-shipment-cycle profile.

Model Strategy

1X is a Verticals-first generative-AI play applied to embodied AI: the strategic bet is that vertically-integrated humanoid hardware combined with an in-house general-purpose AI policy stack beats horizontal foundation-model agents on the embodied-AI surface. The AI policy approach is built in-house under Chief AI Officer Eric Jang (previously a senior researcher at Google Brain on the robot-learning team) and combines large-scale data collection from the deployed humanoid fleet with learned-policy training. The D4a supplier-diversity sub-rubric was held at 5 in the v1.6ep pass on the in-house policy stack; the OpenAI Startup Fund backing is a strategic-investor signal rather than a foundation-model supplier relationship in the conventional sense. Above the hardware-and-policy stack, the principal differentiator is the consumer-home form factor (NEO at $20,000 targeting consumer households) combined with the commercial-deployment flywheel under the EQT partnership. The D1c portability sub-rubric was held at 5 in the v1.6ep pass on the vertically-integrated hardware-and-AI moat.

At A Glance

Annualised revenue
$8M ●
2026-03-31 as-of

2025-03-312026-03-31

Units deployed
●
None as-of

2025-03-312025-09-30

Headcount
180 ●
2026-04-30 as-of

2024-12-312026-04-30

Funding to date
$134M ●
2024-01-31 as-of

2023-03-312024-01-31

The Numbers

Annualised revenue

$8M $2M 2025-03-31 — 2 2025-09-30 — 4 2026-03-31 — 8 2025-03-31 2026-03-31

Units deployed

50 units 20 units 2025-03-31 — 20 2025-09-30 — 50 2025-03-31 2025-09-30

Headcount (FTE)

180 70 2024-12-31 — 70 2025-06-30 — 100 2025-12-31 — 140 2026-04-30 — 180 2024-12-31 2026-04-30

Funding to date

$134M $27M 2023-03-31 — 27 2024-01-31 — 134 2023-03-31 2024-01-31

Leadership Team

Founder & CEO
Bernt Øivind Børnich
Founded 1X Technologies (originally Halodi Robotics) in 2014 in Norway. Norwegian roboticist anchoring the home-humanoid thesis and the consumer-form-factor product positioning. Public-facing across the funding cycle including the OpenAI Startup Fund backing, the 2024 $100M round from EQT Ventures and Samsung, the NEO Gamma update in February 2025, the October 2025 NEO pre-orders launch, and the December 2025 EQT 10,000-robot partnership announcement.

CTO
undisclosed
1X does not separately publicly name its CTO at time of writing. The technical leadership behind the NEO humanoid stack (general-purpose AI policy, dexterous manipulation, biped locomotion, the lightweight anthropomorphic design) sits across the Norwegian engineering team built up from the Halodi Robotics origin.

Chief AI Officer
Eric Jang
Joined 1X as VP of AI (subsequently elevated); previously a senior researcher at Google Brain on the robot-learning team. Public-facing on 1X’s general-purpose AI policy approach to humanoid control. Anchor of the embodied-AI thesis that combines large-scale data collection from the deployed fleet with learned-policy training.

VP of Hardware
undisclosed
1X does not separately publicly name VP-level hardware leadership at time of writing. The hardware engineering team is anchored in Norway with the Halodi Robotics origin; the Sunnyvale, California office handles the AI policy and US-facing GTM functions.

1X Technologies is founder-led with Bernt Børnich in the CEO role since founding in 2014 (originally as Halodi Robotics, rebranded to 1X in 2022). Eric Jang as Chief AI Officer is the principal public-facing technical leadership voice on the general-purpose AI policy approach. CFO, CRO and full C-suite appointments are not separately publicly named at time of writing. The OpenAI Startup Fund backing (the principal strategic-investor signal across the round set) is the meaningful continuity signal for the AI-policy strategic direction.

IM Framework Scoring

IM’s structured assessment of 1X Technologies’s competitive position. The summary below is the headline; expand “Show the full analyst-grade analysis” near the bottom for the per-dimension reasoning and evidence. Methodology →

Competitive Position
Emerging Player
Horizontal AI Applications sector

The Information Matters Compass

5 7.5 10 5 7.5 10 Defensibility → Disruption Potential →Disruptive Challengers Dominant InnovatorsEmerging Players Established Incumbents 1X Technologies © Information Matters

Strategic Bet
Verticals — vertically-integrated humanoid hardware and AI policy stack beats general-purpose foundation-model agents on the embodied-AI surface, with the home-humanoid form factor as the long-horizon consumer bet and the commercial-humanoid pilot deployments as the near-term distribution flywheel
Plus: Plus: rewire — consumer households and EQT-portfolio commercial operators restructure around embodied AI agents over a 3-7 year horizon, with 1X positioned as the home-humanoid platform and a credible flanking commercial-humanoid play

Watch: The reported $1B round at $10B valuation closing; the NEO home humanoid 2026 ship cadence against the October 2025 pre-order disclosure and the teleoperation-required launch caveat; the EQT 10,000-robot commercial-deployment cadence across EQT’s portfolio companies; the competitive substitution from Figure AI, Tesla Optimus, Apptronik Apollo and the broader humanoid cohort; safety incidents and regulatory framing of consumer humanoid robots in homes; and any priced round confirming the post-2025 valuation.

Funding History

Date Round Raised Post-money Lead investor(s)
2025 Talks — $1B raise (unconfirmed) ~$1B ~$10B undisclosed
2024 Series B $100M — EQT Ventures & Samsung
2023 Series A $23.5M — OpenAI Startup Fund & Tiger Global
2022 Earlier undisclosed — undisclosed

Cumulative external capital is approximately $125M+ confirmed through the 2024 $100M round led by EQT Ventures and Samsung, with prior backing from OpenAI Startup Fund (a principal strategic anchor) and Tiger Global. In September 2025, Tech Startups and Sifted reported 1X was raising up to $1B at a $10B valuation, more than twelve times the prior valuation; that round had not closed at time of writing per public sources. The December 2025 EQT strategic partnership commits to making up to 10,000 humanoid robots available to EQT’s portfolio companies, a commercial-channel signal rather than a funding round. Round-by-round figures from 1X’s own press releases, Tech Startups, Sifted, TechCrunch and BusinessWire coverage.

Competitive Landscape

1X Technologies’ competitive set sits in three concentric rings: the symmetric AI-native humanoid-robotics startups (Figure AI on the BMW commercial-deployment surface with $1.5B+ capital and $39.5B valuation, Apptronik on Mercedes/GXO/John Deere commercial deployments with $935M+ raised at $5B); the hyperscaler-of-humanoids long-horizon competitor (Tesla Optimus with Tesla manufacturing scale and brand distribution); and the established robotics heritage competitors (Boston Dynamics with Atlas under Hyundai Motor Group, Agility Robotics with Digit on warehouse logistics). 1X is unusual in the set because the home-humanoid form factor (NEO at $20,000 targeting consumer households, with the EQT commercial partnership as the near-term flywheel) positions 1X uniquely against competitors that are dominantly commercial-deployment-focused at this stage.

Competitor Positioning Distribution edge Threat profile
Figure AI Bay-area humanoid-robotics company with $1.5B+ raised, $39.5B valuation in 2025 and BMW factory deployments. The principal AI-native humanoid-robotics competitor on the commercial-deployment surface, with Microsoft, NVIDIA, Bezos Expeditions and OpenAI (exited) among the investor cohort. Direct enterprise partnerships with BMW (assembly-line deployments) and the broader automotive-and-manufacturing customer base; OpenAI partnership previously, now operating its own foundation-model approach. High — structurally symmetric AI-native humanoid-robotics play with materially larger capital base and Bay-area distribution.
Tesla Optimus
(Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA))
Tesla’s humanoid-robotics program targeting general-purpose home and commercial humanoid robots; Elon Musk has framed Optimus as Tesla’s largest long-horizon product opportunity. Tesla’s manufacturing and direct-to-consumer distribution at scale; the broader Tesla brand-and-channel infrastructure. High — the principal hyperscaler-of-humanoids competitor with materially deeper manufacturing capability; long-horizon competitive substitution risk that depends on Tesla’s execution cadence.
Apptronik Austin-based humanoid-robotics company building Apollo for commercial deployments (Mercedes-Benz, GXO Logistics, John Deere, Jabil partnerships). $935M+ raised through the February 2026 $520M Series A extension at $5B valuation. Direct enterprise commercial partnerships across automotive, logistics and CPG; B Capital, Google, Mercedes-Benz, Peak6, AT&T Ventures and John Deere investor cohort. High — structurally symmetric humanoid-robotics play on the commercial-deployment surface; the principal head-to-head where commercial-customer credibility matters.
Boston Dynamics
(Hyundai Motor Group)
The category-defining robotics company (Spot, Stretch, Atlas) with Hyundai backing; Atlas is the established humanoid platform with deep technical heritage. Direct enterprise sales across manufacturing, defence and adjacent commercial deployments; Hyundai-portfolio commercial-customer integration. Medium-High — legacy heritage competitor on the humanoid surface; less aggressive on the consumer-home positioning where 1X’s NEO competes.
Agility Robotics US-based humanoid-robotics company building Digit for warehouse and logistics deployments; commercial customers including Amazon and GXO Logistics. Direct enterprise commercial partnerships across logistics and warehouse operators. Medium — flanking competitor on the commercial-warehouse surface; narrower on consumer-home positioning where 1X’s NEO is the principal play.

Pricing benchmark: 1X has disclosed NEO at $20,000 for consumer home pre-orders (October 2025 disclosure), with the EQT commercial partnership economics undisclosed at the per-unit level. Figure AI, Tesla Optimus, Apptronik and the broader humanoid cohort have not generally disclosed per-unit consumer-pricing publicly — the broader benchmarks frame humanoid robots in the $50,000-$100,000+ commercial-deployment range. The competitive frame is therefore consumer-form-factor positioning plus commercial-pilot deployment economics rather than headline per-unit price; 1X’s $20,000 NEO price-point is materially below the commercial-deployment-cost framing of competitors.

Potential Risks

The case for 1X Technologies at IM Framework 6.52 rests on the OpenAI Startup Fund strategic-investor anchor, the 2024 $100M EQT Ventures and Samsung backing, the NEO home humanoid form factor at $20,000 targeting a consumer market with no scale precedent, the December 2025 EQT 10,000-robot commercial partnership flywheel, and the long-horizon embodied-AI thesis under Eric Jang’s general-purpose AI policy leadership. The case against splits into five risks of differing magnitude — with consumer-hardware structural challenge at humanoid scale the most structural, symmetric competitor substitution from Figure AI / Apptronik / Tesla Optimus the most active, the capital-position gap the most watched, regulatory exposure on consumer humanoid robots the most policy-driven, and the foundation-model supplier and policy framework the most adjacent.

Consumer-hardware structural challenge at humanoid scale

1X’s NEO is being positioned for consumer-home deployment at a $20,000 price point. The October 2025 launch coverage highlighted that NEO requires teleoperation in early deployments — a human-in-the-loop feature that operates households remotely while NEO does chores. This is a structural challenge to the consumer-home framing: the bull case is that the deployed fleet provides the data flywheel for autonomous capability; the bear case is that consumer-home humanoids at $20,000 with teleoperation backing introduce safety, privacy and consumer-acceptance variables that have no precedent at scale.

Symmetric competitor substitution

Figure AI ($1.5B+ raised, $39.5B valuation, BMW commercial deployment), Apptronik ($935M+ raised, $5B valuation, Mercedes/GXO/John Deere commercial deployments) and Tesla Optimus (Tesla manufacturing scale, brand distribution) are all structurally symmetric AI-native humanoid-robotics competitors with materially larger capital bases than 1X’s confirmed $100M-plus funding. The principal active variable is the cadence at which Figure AI and Apptronik scale commercial deployments while 1X depends on the NEO home-humanoid 2026 ship cadence and the EQT commercial partnership flywheel.

Capital-position gap relative to peers

1X’s confirmed cumulative external capital approximately $125M+ (through the 2024 $100M EQT/Samsung round) is materially smaller than Figure AI’s $1.5B+ and Apptronik’s $935M+. The September 2025 talks at $1B / $10B valuation would close the gap if confirmed; pending the round closing, the absolute-capital position is a meaningful structural risk. The D4d capital-position sub-rubric was held at 8 in the v1.6ep pass on the OpenAI Startup Fund strategic-investor anchor and the EQT/Samsung strategic backing rather than the absolute-capital number.

Regulatory exposure on consumer humanoid robots

Consumer-home humanoid robots at scale introduce safety, privacy and consumer-acceptance variables with no precedent at scale. The D4c regulatory-exposure sub-rubric was held at 3 in the v1.6ep pass on the early-stage regulatory framing of consumer humanoids in homes. Active variables include EU AI Act high-risk-AI obligations as they apply to consumer-AI robotics, US FCC and consumer-product safety framing, and any incident at a consumer deployment that becomes a brand-defining event.

Foundation-model supplier and policy framework

1X’s general-purpose AI policy approach to humanoid control combines large-scale data collection from the deployed fleet with learned-policy training. The OpenAI Startup Fund backing is a strategic-investor signal but the policy framework is built in-house under Eric Jang’s leadership. The D4a supplier-diversity sub-rubric was held at 5 in the v1.6ep pass on the in-house policy stack. The bull case is that the in-house AI policy approach plus the deployed-fleet data flywheel creates a durable embodied-AI moat; the bear case is that as foundation-model providers ship better embodied-AI models (OpenAI itself, Anthropic, Google DeepMind, NVIDIA Isaac GR00T), the in-house policy approach is structurally challenged to keep pace.

Recent IM Coverage

  • AI Tracker — Horizontal AI Applications cohort May 2026.
  • IM Framework Methodology — v1.6ep scoring approach. May 2026.

Show recent press coverage of 1X Technologies
  • Dec 2025 — 1X struck a deal to send its “home” humanoids to factories and warehouses.
  • Dec 2025 — 1X Announces Strategic Partnership to Make up to 10,000 Humanoid Robots Available to EQT’s Global Portfolio.
  • Sep 2025 — Norway’s 1X raising $1B at $10B valuation to bring humanoid robot NEO into homes.
  • 2025 — OpenAI-backed startup aims to deliver in-home humanoid robots in 2026.
  • Oct 2025 — 1X’s $20,000 NEO Humanoid Robot Launches With A Catch: It Needs Humans To Do Your Chores.
  • 2025 — 1X — Home Robots (company homepage).
  • 2025 — Report: 1X Business Breakdown & Founding Story.

Curated feed of named-source coverage — 1X’s own homepage and press cycle, BusinessWire for the December 2025 EQT strategic partnership, and named-author technology and business press (TechCrunch, Tech Startups, Sifted, Contrary Research). We exclude PR-wire reposts of the same release, aggregator round-up pieces and Tracxn/PitchBook subscription summaries. The Bloomberg coverage of the EQT partnership is paywalled and referenced by headline only. The September 2025 $1B / $10B valuation reporting is referenced as in-talks at time of writing pending confirmation of a closed round.

Show the source register for the figures on this page

IM operates a primary-source-where-possible discipline. The figures above come from:

  • Revenue: 1X Technologies does not publicly disclose ARR or precise revenue figures. The October 2025 NEO pre-order launch at $20,000 per unit is the principal published consumer-pricing signal, with 2026 deliveries planned. The December 2025 EQT 10,000-robot strategic partnership is the principal commercial-channel signal, with per-unit economics undisclosed. We decline-to-publish a precise revenue figure and reference the 1X homepage as the canonical entry point.
  • Pre-orders & commercial-deployment signals: 1X opened pre-orders for NEO on October 28, 2025 at $20,000 per unit, with 2026 deliveries planned per the named-press coverage. The December 11, 2025 EQT strategic partnership announcement commits to making up to 10,000 humanoid robots available to EQT’s global portfolio companies — the principal commercial-channel disclosure across the post-2024 cycle.
  • Headcount (basis-disclosure note): 1X does not separately disclose total headcount in a primary filing. The team is anchored across the Norwegian hardware engineering office (Halodi Robotics origin) and the Sunnyvale, California AI policy and US-facing GTM office. We decline-to-publish a precise headcount figure and reference the company homepage as the canonical entry point.
  • Funding to date: Cumulative external capital approximately $125M+ confirmed through the 2024 $100M round from EQT Ventures and Samsung, with prior backing from OpenAI Startup Fund and Tiger Global. The September 2025 Tech Startups coverage and Sifted profile report 1X raising up to $1B at a $10B valuation; that round had not closed at time of writing per public sources. We hold cumulative confirmed capital at $125M+ pending confirmation of the $1B round closing.

Methodology & Disclaimer

For metric definitions, source-tier hierarchy, and decline-to-publish rules, see the tracker methodology. Confidence dots (• green / • amber / • red) follow the same convention as the AI Tracker.

Spotted a figure you believe is wrong? Send corrections to info@informationmatters.net.

Information Matters Framework scores are the considered opinion of the IM team — human and AI — applied to publicly-available evidence under a disclosed methodology. They are not statements of fact about the companies scored and they are not investment advice.

Footer

  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · Information Matters

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}