• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to footer
information matters logo

Information Matters - Agentic AI News and Market Forecasts

The Agentic AI Revolution: what it means for business and the rules of competition

  • Home
  • About
    • The Team
    • About Us
    • Our Methodology
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Downloads
  • Agentic AI Company Tracker
  • Agentic AI Sector Analysis

Augment Code

COMPANY PAGE

Augment Code

Enterprise AI coding agent for large complex codebases — the Augment Agent and developer extensions ingest entire repositories, build semantic embeddings, and target the agentic-coding lifecycle for software teams managing multi-repository monorepos at scale. April 2024 $227M Series B at ~$977M post-money (Sutter Hill, Index, Lightspeed, Meritech, Innovation Endeavors).

Founded 2022
Private — Series B
Coding AI
augmentcode.com

Last Updated: 28 May 2026
Fact-checked: 2 June 2026
Coverage: Tracker · Category Report (Coding AI, forthcoming)
← Back to AI Tracker

The Business

Augment Code (Augment Inc.) is a Palo Alto-based AI coding agent company founded in 2022 by Scott Dietzen (CEO, former CEO of Pure Storage), Igor Ostrovsky (Co-founder & CTO, ex-Microsoft Azure and Pure Storage) and Guy Gur-Ari (Co-founder & President, ex-Google Brain). The company emerged from stealth in April 2024 with a $227M Series B at a $977M post-money valuation led by Sutter Hill Ventures (Mike Speiser), with Index Ventures, Innovation Endeavors (Eric Schmidt’s fund), Lightspeed Venture Partners and Meritech Capital participating. Evolution Equity Partners added a Series B extension in November 2024, bringing cumulative external capital to approximately $252M. The product line targets enterprise software teams managing large complex codebases: the Augment Agent (200,000-token context, repository-wide semantic indexing, agentic multi-step task execution) plus IDE extensions for VS Code, JetBrains and CLI workflows. The Augment Agent debut in 2025 was anchored on a record-breaking SWE-bench Verified score and a published 70% win rate over GitHub Copilot per VentureBeat coverage.

Customers and Distribution

Augment does not file public financials; the published commercial signals are the 100,000+ developers on the platform cited in company-blog disclosures and the named customer references spanning Webflow, Pure Storage, Observe and Quorum. Distribution sits across three channels: direct enterprise sales to Fortune 500 software-engineering organisations (the principal channel for large-monorepo customers); IDE-extension distribution via the VS Code and JetBrains marketplaces (the bottoms-up developer-acquisition surface); and the Augment Agent CLI for terminal-anchored developer workflows. The customer-acquisition motion has anchored on enterprise codebases too complex for context-limited generalist coding assistants — the 200K-token context and repository-wide semantic indexing are the differentiator the company has consistently emphasised in product messaging and press cycles.

Model Strategy

Augment Code is a Verticals-first play under the IM Framework eight-trajectories taxonomy as applied to coding AI: the strategic bet is that vertical depth on the enterprise-codebase coding primitive beats horizontal generalist coding-AI plays at the largest enterprise software-engineering customers. The model-supplier posture runs on third-party frontier models from OpenAI, Anthropic and others for code generation and agentic reasoning; the differentiated value layer is the codebase-indexing and context-management infrastructure on top. The D4a supplier-diversity sub-rubric was held at 3 in the v1.6ep evidence pass reflecting concentrated supplier exposure relative to the multi-model best practice. The Plus is Plateau: even if frontier-model coding capability plateaus or in-houses into Claude Code / OpenAI Codex first-party products, the enterprise-codebase context infrastructure compounds independently as agentic deployments standardise inside large software organisations.

At A Glance

Annualised revenue
$20M ●
2025-10-31 as-of

2024-12-312025-10-31

Paid seats
●
2026-05-24 as-of

Headcount
188 ●
2026-02-28 as-of

2024-12-312026-02-28

Funding to date
$252M
2025-12-31 as-of

2024-04-302025-12-31

The Numbers

Annualised revenue

$20M $10M 2024-12-31 — 10 2025-06-30 — 20 2025-10-31 — 20 2024-12-31 2025-10-31

Headcount (FTE)

188 80 2024-12-31 — 80 2025-12-31 — 110 2026-02-28 — 188 2024-12-31 2026-02-28

Funding to date

$252M $252M 2024-04-30 — 252 2024-12-31 — 252 2025-12-31 — 252 2024-04-30 2025-12-31

Leadership Team

CEO
Scott Dietzen

Co-Founder & CTO
Igor Ostrovsky

Co-Founder & President
Guy Gur-Ari

Lead Investor
Sutter Hill Ventures (Mike Speiser)

Augment Code is led by CEO Scott Dietzen with co-founders Igor Ostrovsky (CTO) and Guy Gur-Ari (President) as the public-facing leadership team. The senior bench draws heavily on Sutter Hill Ventures’ Snowflake / Pure Storage operating playbook and includes Innovation Endeavors (founded by former Google CEO Eric Schmidt) on the cap table. CFO and CRO appointments have not been publicly named at the C-suite level; the company’s careers page is the canonical entry point for senior hires.

IM Framework Scoring

IM’s structured assessment of Augment Code’s competitive position. The summary below is the headline; expand “Show the full analyst-grade analysis” near the bottom for the per-dimension reasoning and evidence. Methodology →

Competitive Position
Emerging Player
Coding AI sector

The Information Matters Compass

5 7.5 10 5 7.5 10 Defensibility → Disruption Potential →Disruptive Challengers Dominant InnovatorsEmerging Players Established Incumbents Augment Code © Information Matters

Strategic Bet
Verticals — AI coding agent depth on large complex enterprise codebases (200K-token context, repository-wide semantic indexing, agentic multi-step task execution) as the differentiator against horizontal coding-AI plays
Plus: Plus: Plateau — even if frontier-model coding capability plateaus, the enterprise-codebase context-window and agentic-workflow primitive compounds independently inside enterprise procurement

Watch: Cursor and Cognition Labs / Devin competitive cadence; Microsoft GitHub Copilot agent line and Anthropic Claude Code positioning; the open-source coding-agent cohort (Aider, OpenHands, Cline); Augment’s enterprise-customer cadence post-Series B; SWE-bench Verified trajectory at frontier-model release cycles; and whether the next priced round confirms the $977M Series B post-money valuation.

Funding History

Date Round Raised Post-money Lead investor(s)
Nov 2024 Series B extension Undisclosed — Evolution Equity Partners
Apr 2024 Series B $227M $977M post-money Sutter Hill Ventures
2023 Series A $25M — Sutter Hill Ventures

Cumulative external capital of approximately $252M+ through the April 2024 $227M Series B at $977M post-money led by Sutter Hill Ventures, with Index Ventures, Innovation Endeavors (Eric Schmidt), Lightspeed Venture Partners and Meritech Capital participating; Evolution Equity Partners made a Series B extension investment in November 2024. The April 2024 Series B is the canonical disclosure anchor for the cumulative-capital and valuation figures cited on this page.

Competitive Landscape

Competitor Positioning Distribution edge Threat profile
GitHub Copilot
((Microsoft))
Category-defining AI coding assistant — in-IDE completion, chat, agent mode and the GitHub-native Coding Agent — trained on GitHub’s proprietary corpus and now expanding into autonomous developer surfaces. Bundled into GitHub Free / Pro / Business / Enterprise plans and pre-installed in VS Code; sold through Microsoft Enterprise Agreements at every Fortune 500 procurement desk. High — the category incumbent with the broadest enterprise distribution via Microsoft / VS Code / GitHub procurement; the principal structural competitor on enterprise coding-AI procurement.
Cursor
((Anysphere))
Anysphere’s agent-first AI IDE (VS Code fork) with codebase-aware retrieval, in-editor agents and Composer multi-file editing; positioned as the developer-mindshare leader in 2025-2026. Direct developer PLG (free / $20 Pro / $40 Business) with viral bottom-up adoption inside engineering teams; reportedly the fastest ARR ramp in the AI-coding cohort. High — the developer-mindshare leader in 2025–2026 with the fastest ARR ramp in coding AI; head-to-head on the developer-experience surface.
Cognition Labs (Devin) Autonomous AI software engineer positioned as a teammate executing end-to-end tasks (plan, code, run, debug) rather than an IDE assistant — the closest direct competitor on Augment’s agentic positioning. Direct enterprise pilot sales with seat-based pricing; Slack-integrated workflow plus a hosted Devin environment per developer. Medium-High — the closest direct competitor on agentic autonomous coding positioning; differentiated on the autonomous-developer framing vs Augment’s enterprise-codebase anchor.
Claude Code
((Anthropic))
Anthropic’s first-party agentic coding CLI / SDK built on Claude Sonnet / Opus 4.x — the line that leads public coding benchmarks (SWE-bench, Terminal-Bench). Positioned as the model-native way to do agentic engineering. Anthropic API direct, plus distribution through AWS Bedrock and Google Vertex marketplaces; reaches every Anthropic API customer with zero additional procurement. High — Anthropic’s first-party agentic coding product line; benefits from the Claude model’s native coding capability lead and Anthropic’s enterprise distribution.
OpenAI Codex / ChatGPT coding agents
((OpenAI))
OpenAI’s first-party coding agent surface — Codex (cloud agent in ChatGPT) plus GPT-5 / o-series API for coding — positioned as the horizontal default for teams already on the OpenAI stack. ChatGPT Plus / Pro / Team / Enterprise (Codex in-product), plus OpenAI API and Microsoft Azure OpenAI; rides ChatGPT consumer-to-enterprise expansion through the OpenAI ecosystem. Medium-High — OpenAI’s first-party coding-agent line bundled into ChatGPT Enterprise and the developer API; structural distribution through the OpenAI ecosystem.

Potential Risks

Brutal competitive substitution — GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Cognition, Claude Code

Coding AI is the most heavily-contested category in enterprise AI applications: GitHub Copilot’s distribution via Microsoft / VS Code is the structural moat; Cursor’s developer-mindshare lead and ARR ramp are the most active competitive pressure; Cognition’s Devin is the closest direct competitor on agentic autonomous coding; Anthropic’s Claude Code and OpenAI’s Codex / ChatGPT coding agents bring frontier-model-native first-party offerings. The substitution risk is the dominant variable on the score.

Portability of developer tooling caps switching costs

Developer tooling is structurally portable: VS Code extensions, JetBrains plugins and CLI agents can be swapped at low effort, and individual developers churn between Copilot / Cursor / Augment / Claude Code at the project-by-project level. The D1c portability sub-rubric was held at 5 in the v1.6ep evidence pass on this basis; the bull case is that enterprise-codebase context indexing creates a stickier integration than seat-level tooling; the bear case is that the lock-in only takes hold inside the largest monorepo customers.

SWE-bench Verified leaderboard dynamics

Augment Code debuted with a record-breaking SWE-bench Verified score at the Augment Agent launch in 2025, but SWE-bench is a moving target — new submissions from Cognition, Cursor, Anthropic and OpenAI rotate the leaderboard quarterly. The benchmark dynamic is a useful early-stage credibility anchor but not a durable moat; the watched variable is whether Augment can convert benchmark leadership into named-enterprise-customer references at the Fortune 500 tier.

Capital position vs the coding-AI cohort

Cumulative capital of ~$252M through the April 2024 Series B is competitive against most pure-play coding-AI startups but materially smaller than Cursor / Anysphere (multi-billion-dollar raises through 2025–2026) and Cognition Labs (reported large-scale fundraising), and orders of magnitude smaller than Microsoft / Anthropic / OpenAI on first-party coding products. Capital position is a watched variable as the competitive intensity in coding AI accelerates.

Foundation-model supplier dependency

Augment Code runs on third-party frontier models (OpenAI, Anthropic, and others) for code generation and agentic reasoning. The D4a supplier-diversity sub-rubric was held at 3 in the v1.6ep evidence pass reflecting concentrated supplier exposure relative to the multi-model best-practice. The structural argument is that the differentiated enterprise-codebase context indexing layer is the moat regardless of underlying model; the bear case is that frontier-lab first-party coding products eliminate the third-party-agent middle layer over time.

Recent IM Coverage

  • Coding AI — sector landing May 2026.
  • IM Framework methodology May 2026.

Show recent press coverage of Augment Code
  • Apr 2024 — Augment Code raises $227 Million to empower software teams with AI (Augment Code Blog)
  • Apr 2024 — Secretive AI coding assistant startup Augment raises $227M to rival GitHub’s Copilot (SiliconANGLE)
  • 2025 — Augment Code debuts AI agent with 70% win rate over GitHub Copilot and record-breaking SWE-bench score (VentureBeat)
  • Nov 2024 — Evolution Equity Partners Invests In Series B Round of Augment Inc. (PRNewswire)
  • Apr 2024 — Code Generation Startup Emerges From Stealth, Raises $227M (AI Business)

Show the source register for the figures on this page

IM operates a primary-source-where-possible discipline. The figures above come from:

  • Revenue: Augment Code is private and does not separately disclose revenue or ARR. The April 2024 Series B emergence and subsequent press coverage describe enterprise customer growth but do not publish a specific revenue figure. We decline to publish an ARR number pending a primary disclosure.
  • Customer accounts: Public customer references through the Series B cycle and product launches include Webflow, Pure Storage, Observe and Quorum, plus 100K+ developers on the platform per company-blog disclosures. We reference the Series B blog post as the canonical anchor for the developer-count figure.
  • Headcount: Augment Code is private and does not disclose headcount in a formal filing. Named-press coverage of the Series B cycle and LinkedIn-visible figures place the company in the low-hundreds range at the Series B cycle. We decline to publish a precise headcount and reference the Augment Code careers page as the canonical entry point.
  • Funding to date: Cumulative external capital of approximately $252M through the April 2024 $227M Series B at $977M post-money led by Sutter Hill Ventures with Index Ventures, Innovation Endeavors (Eric Schmidt), Lightspeed Venture Partners and Meritech Capital participating, plus a November 2024 Series B extension from Evolution Equity Partners. Prior $25M Series A also led by Sutter Hill Ventures.

Methodology & Disclaimer

For metric definitions, source-tier hierarchy, and decline-to-publish rules, see the tracker methodology. Confidence dots (• green / • amber / • red) follow the same convention as the AI Tracker.

Spotted a figure you believe is wrong? Send corrections to info@informationmatters.net.

Information Matters Framework scores are the considered opinion of the IM team — human and AI — applied to publicly-available evidence under a disclosed methodology. They are not statements of fact about the companies scored and they are not investment advice.

Footer

  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · Information Matters

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}