• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to footer
information matters logo

Information Matters - Agentic AI News and Market Forecasts

The Agentic AI Revolution: what it means for business and the rules of competition

  • Home
  • About
    • The Team
    • About Us
    • Our Methodology
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Downloads
  • Agentic AI Company Tracker
  • Agentic AI Sector Analysis

Schrödinger

COMPANY PAGE

Schrödinger

Physics-and-AI-based computational drug discovery and materials design — the public Nasdaq-listed Schrödinger (SDGR) platform combines physics-based simulation with machine learning to enable the discovery of novel, highly optimised molecules for drug and materials applications. FY2025 revenue $255.9M (+23%) with software $199.5M and drug discovery $56.4M; ~900 employees across 15 global locations.

Founded 1990
Public — Nasdaq SDGR
Healthcare AI
schrodinger.com

Last Updated: 28 May 2026
Fact-checked: 2 June 2026
Coverage: Tracker · Category Report (Healthcare AI, forthcoming)
← Back to AI Tracker

The Business

Schrödinger is the public Nasdaq-listed (SDGR) computational drug-discovery and materials-design company built on a 35-year-old proprietary physics-based simulation library combined with modern machine-learning capabilities. The product line spans the software platform (~78% of revenue, sold to pharmaceutical, biotech and materials companies plus academic research institutions) and the drug-discovery program economics (collaboration partnerships with major pharma including a disclosed Novartis collaboration with $5.7M Q1 2025 revenue recognition, plus proprietary pipeline programs SGR-1505, SGR-3515, SGR-5573 and SGR-6016). The company was founded in 1990, has approximately 900 employees across 15 global locations, and went public in February 2020 at a $232.2M IPO. FY2025 total revenue was $255.9M (+23%) with software revenue $199.5M (+10.6%) and drug-discovery revenue $56.4M per Schrödinger’s 10-K and earnings press releases. The Q3 2025 strategic pivot to exit independent clinical development and focus on profitable discovery-stage partnerships is the principal capital-allocation framing.

Customers and Distribution

Schrödinger’s software customer base includes the largest global pharmaceutical companies, the major biotech and biopharma cohort, leading academic research institutions, and materials-discovery customers per the company’s IR disclosures and named-press coverage. The software-revenue trajectory (FY2025 $199.5M, +10.6% growth) is the principal proxy disclosure given Schrödinger does not separately publish a precise customer count. Distribution sits across three principal motions: direct enterprise software-licence sales to pharma and biotech (the dominant revenue channel with ~78% share), direct drug-discovery partnership economics with major pharma collaborators (the Novartis collaboration and other partnerships disclosed across the press cycle with milestone-and-royalty economics), and academic-research-licensing into leading research institutions globally. The P3c GTM-maturity sub-rubric was held at 7 in the v1.6ep pass on the multi-channel distribution and the post-strategic-pivot partnership economics framing.

Model Strategy

Schrödinger is a Verticals-first generative-AI play applied to computational drug discovery and materials design: the strategic bet is that integrated physics-and-AI computational platforms — 35-year-old proprietary physics-based simulation combined with modern ML capabilities — beat AI-only generative platforms on the regulated pharma-and-materials discovery surface where accuracy, explainability and downstream-development risk matter for procurement decisions. The model strategy is supplier-agnostic at the foundation-model layer (Schrödinger develops its own physics-based and ML models rather than depending on external frontier-model providers) with the D4a sub-rubric held at 8 in the v1.6ep pass on the proprietary technical stack and the integration with leading-edge AI capabilities. Above the foundation layer, the principal differentiators are the integrated physics-and-AI platform architecture, the recurring software-revenue base, and the discovery-stage partnership economics that monetise the platform inside pharma collaborator workflows. The D1c portability sub-rubric was held at 7 in the v1.6ep pass on the workflow-embedded enterprise-software depth.

At A Glance

Annualised revenue
$234M ●
2026-03-31 as-of

2024-12-312026-03-31

Active software customers
1,750 ●
2025-12-31 as-of

2023-12-312025-12-31

Headcount
850 ●
2025-12-31 as-of

2023-12-312025-12-31

Funding to date
$350M ●
2025-12-31 as-of

2024-12-312025-12-31

The Numbers

Annualised revenue

$352M $192M 2024-12-31 — 352.0 2025-03-31 — 236.0 2025-06-30 — 192.0 2025-09-30 — 196.0 2025-12-31 — 352.0 2026-03-31 — 234 2024-12-31 2026-03-31

Active software customers

1,750 1,700 2023-12-31 — 1700 2024-12-31 — 1750 2025-12-31 — 1750 2023-12-31 2025-12-31

Headcount (FTE)

850 800 2023-12-31 — 800 2024-12-31 — 820 2025-12-31 — 850 2023-12-31 2025-12-31

Funding to date

$350M $350M 2024-12-31 — 350 2025-12-31 — 350 2024-12-31 2025-12-31

Leadership Team

President & CEO
Ramy Farid Ph.D.
President of Schrödinger since January 2008, CEO since January 2017, and director since December 2012. Anchor of the physics-and-AI integration thesis and the public-company narrative since the February 2020 IPO. Public-facing on every quarterly earnings call and on the strategic pivot disclosed through 2025 to exit independent clinical development and focus on profitable discovery-stage partnerships.

President of R&D, Therapeutics
Karen Akinsanya Ph.D.
President of R&D Therapeutics at Schrödinger; senior pharma R&D operator anchoring the proprietary drug-discovery pipeline (SGR-1505, SGR-3515, SGR-5573, SGR-6016 and partnered programs with Novartis). Public-facing on the therapeutics strategy and the discovery-stage partnership cycle.

CFO
Richie Jain
Chief Financial Officer of Schrödinger per the 2025 CFO appointment press release; succeeded Geoffrey Porges. Anchors the post-strategic-pivot capital allocation and the discovery-stage-partnership economics.

SVP Software Development
Robert Abel Ph.D.
Senior software-development leadership at Schrödinger; long-tenured operator across the physics-and-AI computational platform and the materials-design product line. Anchor of the software-revenue trajectory that contributes ~78% of total revenue.

Schrödinger is a public Nasdaq-listed company (SDGR) with a relatively stable C-suite anchored by Ramy Farid in the CEO role since 2017 and Karen Akinsanya as President of R&D Therapeutics. The strategic pivot through 2025 to exit independent clinical development and focus on profitable discovery-stage partnerships was led from the CEO and CFO offices and disclosed at the Q3 2025 earnings cycle. Senior recruiting has come from pharma R&D and computational-chemistry alumni networks across Merck, Pfizer, Vertex Pharmaceuticals and the broader pharma-discovery cohort. The CFO entry was updated at fact-check — Geoffrey Porges has departed and Richie Jain is the current CFO per a 2025 Schrödinger press release. The prior "M.D." suffix on Porges was incorrect.

IM Framework Scoring

IM’s structured assessment of Schrödinger’s competitive position. The summary below is the headline; expand “Show the full analyst-grade analysis” near the bottom for the per-dimension reasoning and evidence. Methodology →

Competitive Position
Emerging Player
Healthcare AI sector

The Information Matters Compass

5 7.5 10 5 7.5 10 Defensibility → Disruption Potential →Disruptive Challengers Dominant InnovatorsEmerging Players Established Incumbents Schrödinger © Information Matters

Strategic Bet
Verticals — physics-and-AI integration on computational drug discovery and materials design beats horizontal generative-AI on regulated pharma-and-materials procurement, anchored by the 35-year-old physics-based simulation library
Plus: Plus: rewire — pharmaceutical R&D restructures around physics-and-AI computational platforms, with Schrödinger positioned as the platform-of-record for pre-clinical drug discovery

Watch: The cadence of drug-discovery program partnerships (FY2025 drug-discovery revenue grew 295% YoY in Q3) and the 2026 software ACV guidance set at 10-15% growth (range $218-228M); the post-2025 strategic pivot to exit independent clinical development and focus on profitable discovery-stage partnerships; competitive substitution from AI-native platforms (Isomorphic Labs, Chai Discovery, EvolutionaryScale, Generate Biomedicines) on the generative-AI drug-discovery surface; and the public-market re-rating versus the AI-pharma cohort.

Funding History

Date Round Raised Post-money Lead investor(s)
Feb 2020 IPO $232.2M — Nasdaq listing (SDGR)
Apr 2018 Pre-IPO $85M — Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Strategic Investment Fund
Earlier Earlier rounds ~$200M+ — Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation & others

Schrödinger went public on Nasdaq in February 2020 at a $232.2M IPO (ticker SDGR). Prior to the IPO, Schrödinger raised approximately $300M+ in private capital across pre-IPO rounds led by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Strategic Investment Fund, with Google Ventures, ARCH Venture Partners, Bain Capital Life Sciences and others as backers. As a public company, Schrödinger’s commercial framing has shifted from external rounds to operating cash flow, software revenue (~78% of total) and discovery-stage drug-discovery partnership economics. Round-by-round figures from Schrödinger’s SEC filings (S-1 / 10-K / 10-Q), IR investor page and the named-press cycle.

Competitive Landscape

Schrödinger’s competitive set sits in three concentric rings: the AI-native frontier-lab-backed drug-discovery platforms (Isomorphic Labs backed by DeepMind, Chai Discovery, EvolutionaryScale, Generate Biomedicines) that compete on the deep-learning-first generative surface; the established computational-chemistry software incumbents (OpenEye/Cadence Molecular Sciences, Chemical Computing Group, BIOVIA inside Dassault Systèmes) that compete on the broader software-licensing surface; and adjacent AI-pharma plays at the boundary (Recursion Pharmaceuticals, BenevolentAI, Insitro). Schrödinger is unusual in the set because the 35-year-old proprietary physics-based simulation library combined with modern ML capabilities is a structurally different technical heritage from the AI-only generative platforms — the strategic bet is that physics-and-AI integration beats AI-only on the regulated pharma-discovery surface where accuracy and explainability matter for downstream development decisions.

Competitor Positioning Distribution edge Threat profile
Isomorphic Labs
(Alphabet/Google DeepMind)
AI-native drug-discovery platform spun out of DeepMind; AlphaFold-anchored protein-structure prediction plus de-novo molecular design. The principal AI-native frontier-lab-backed competitor on the computational drug-discovery surface. Direct pharma partnership deals; Eli Lilly and Novartis partnerships disclosed in 2024-2025; DeepMind technical-research credibility as top-of-funnel. High — AI-native frontier-lab-backed competitor with structurally different technical heritage (deep-learning-first rather than physics-first).
Chai Discovery AI-native frontier model for drug discovery; Series B with backing from major investors; targeting de-novo molecular design and protein-structure prediction at competitive accuracy benchmarks. Direct pharma partnership deals; research-credibility-anchored top-of-funnel; emerging customer mix. Medium-High — structurally symmetric AI-native pure-play; the head-to-head pressure is on the de-novo molecular design surface where Schrödinger’s physics-and-AI integration competes.
EvolutionaryScale Frontier-lab AI for biology; the ESM3 protein language model is a category-defining technical milestone in biological sequence modelling. Backed by major investors with $142M Series A. Direct biotech and pharma partnership deals; research and academic-community top-of-funnel. Medium-High — emerging AI-native frontier-lab competitor on the biology-modelling surface; flanking risk on the protein-and-biology side of Schrödinger’s discovery pipeline.
Generate Biomedicines Flagship Pioneering-backed AI-native protein-design and drug-discovery platform; generative biology as the core thesis. $273M Series C at $1.0B+ valuation. Direct pharma partnership deals; deep Flagship Pioneering biotech-network top-of-funnel. Medium-High — AI-native protein-design competitor; flanking risk on the generative-biology surface of Schrödinger’s pipeline.
OpenEye Scientific / CCG / BIOVIA
(OpenEye now Cadence Molecular Sciences; CCG independent; BIOVIA (Dassault Systèmes))
Established computational-chemistry software incumbents — OpenEye now inside Cadence Molecular Sciences, Chemical Computing Group (CCG) independent, BIOVIA inside Dassault Systèmes. The principal alternative computational-chemistry-software incumbents to Schrödinger. Direct pharma and academic-licensing channels; deep pharma R&D installed bases. Medium — structural-overlap competitors on the computational-chemistry software surface; less direct on the AI integration where Schrödinger has led with physics-and-AI through 2024-2025.

Pricing benchmark: Schrödinger sells software on per-seat enterprise licences plus partnership-based drug-discovery economics with collaboration milestones and equity stakes in some cases (Novartis collaboration disclosed $5.7M Q1 recognition). Isomorphic Labs, Chai Discovery and Generate Biomedicines monetise primarily through pharma-partnership economics with downstream royalties. OpenEye / CCG / BIOVIA sell on traditional enterprise-software licensing models. The competitive frame is therefore the integrated physics-and-AI computational-platform-of-record motion plus partnership-economics rather than headline per-seat or per-license price.

Potential Risks

The case for Schrödinger at IM Framework 6.56 rests on the 35-year-old proprietary physics-based simulation library combined with modern ML capabilities, the 23% FY2025 revenue growth disclosed in the 10-K, the ~900-employee global organisation, the recurring software-revenue base (~78% of total), and the strategic pivot through 2025 to exit independent clinical development and focus on profitable discovery-stage partnerships. The case against splits into five risks of differing magnitude — with regulatory exposure on pharma applications the most structural, the strategic-pivot execution the most active, AI-native competitor substitution the most adjacent, public-market re-rating the most policy-driven, and capital-position framing the most operational.

Regulatory exposure on pharma applications

Schrödinger operates in a heavily regulated pharma R&D space with FDA, EMA and global pharma-regulator oversight on any drug candidate that progresses through clinical development. The D4c regulatory-exposure sub-rubric was held at 4 in the v1.6ep pass on the multi-jurisdictional regulated-drug-development load. The Q3 2025 strategic-pivot to exit independent clinical development and focus on profitable discovery-stage partnerships was framed in part as a response to the capital intensity and regulatory load of independent clinical development. The principal active variable is whether the discovery-stage partnership model converts into stable software-and-partnership economics over the next 4-6 quarters.

Strategic pivot execution — exit from independent clinical development

The Q3 2025 strategic-pivot to exit independent clinical development was structurally formative. The pipeline programs (SGR-1505, SGR-3515, SGR-5573, SGR-6016) that were being developed internally are being repositioned for partnership economics with pharma collaborators. The bull case is that this trades clinical-development capital intensity for a more capital-efficient discovery-stage partnership model that better matches Schrödinger’s physics-and-AI computational-platform thesis; the bear case is that pharma partnership economics depend on partner cadence and can compress in slower R&D-spending cycles.

AI-native competitor substitution

The principal substitution risk comes from AI-native drug-discovery platforms — Isomorphic Labs backed by DeepMind, Chai Discovery, EvolutionaryScale on biology modelling, and Generate Biomedicines on generative biology. The bull case is that Schrödinger’s physics-and-AI integration delivers accuracy and explainability that pure AI-only generative platforms cannot match at scale on regulated pharma-discovery use cases; the bear case is that as foundation models for biology improve (AlphaFold 3, ESM3, RFdiffusion), the physics-first heritage compresses into a feature rather than a structural moat. The D4f competitive-substitution sub-rubric was held at 6 in the v1.6ep pass on the active-competitor cadence.

Public-market re-rating exposure

Schrödinger is publicly listed on Nasdaq (SDGR) with FY2025 revenue $255.9M (+23%) and FY2026 software-revenue guidance set at 10-15% growth on delayed pharma scale-ups. The public-market valuation has tracked the broader AI-pharma cohort and the discovery-stage partnership cycle through 2024-2025. The bull case is that the strategic pivot plus continued software-revenue growth and partnership cadence supports a re-rating against the AI-pharma cohort; the bear case is that delayed pharma scale-ups and the competitive AI-native cadence compress the valuation re-rating.

Capital-position framing as a public company

As a public company since February 2020, Schrödinger’s capital position sits on the balance sheet rather than in external rounds. The D4d capital-position sub-rubric was held at 7 in the v1.6ep pass on the public-company balance sheet, the recurring software-revenue base and the strategic-pivot toward profitable discovery-stage partnerships. The competitive cohort (Isomorphic Labs backed by Alphabet, Chai Discovery and Generate Biomedicines well-funded as private companies) brings different capital structures, which is a structural risk in head-to-head partnership-procurement.

Recent IM Coverage

  • AI Tracker — Healthcare AI cohort May 2026.
  • IM Framework Methodology — v1.6ep scoring approach. May 2026.

Show recent press coverage of Schrödinger
  • Mar 2026 — Schrödinger Reports Fourth Quarter and Full-Year 2025 Financial Results.
  • Nov 2025 — Schrödinger Reports Third Quarter 2025 Financial Results.
  • May 2025 — Schrödinger Reports Strong First Quarter 2025 Financial Results.
  • Mar 2026 — Schrödinger Provides Update on Progress Across the Business and Outlines 2026 Strategic Priorities.
  • Nov 2024 — Schrödinger CEO on making physics the basis of AI drug discovery.
  • Mar 2025 — Schrödinger Finally Embraces AI — Is It a Buy?
  • Aug 2025 — Schrödinger Q2 2025 Earnings Transcript.

Curated feed of named-source coverage — Schrödinger’s IR investor page for the quarterly earnings cycle and 10-K disclosures, and named-author business and science press (STAT News, Nanalyze, The Motley Fool). We exclude PR-wire reposts of the same release, aggregator round-up pieces and Tracxn/PitchBook subscription summaries. SEC filings (10-K, 10-Q, S-1 historical) are the primary disclosure anchor for the FY2025 revenue figures and the strategic-pivot disclosures cited on this page.

Show the source register for the figures on this page

IM operates a primary-source-where-possible discipline. The figures above come from:

  • Revenue: Schrödinger’s FY2025 earnings release discloses total revenue of $255.9M (+23%) with software revenue $199.5M (+10.6%) and drug-discovery revenue $56.4M. Q3 2025 total revenue was $54.3M (+54% YoY) with software $40.9M (+28%) and drug discovery $13.5M (+295%). The FY2026 software revenue guidance was set at 10-15% growth in the Q3 2025 earnings cycle on delayed pharma scale-ups; drug-discovery revenue guidance was increased to $49-52M. We hold FY2025 total revenue at $255.9M per the 10-K filings.
  • Software licence customers: Schrödinger does not separately disclose precise software-licence customer counts in its 10-K filings. Named-press coverage (STAT News) references a customer base that includes the largest global pharmaceutical companies, the major biotech and biopharma cohort, leading academic research institutions, and materials-discovery companies. The company homepage is the canonical entry point. We decline-to-publish a precise customer count and reference the software-revenue trajectory as the proxy disclosure.
  • Headcount: Schrödinger discloses approximately 900 employees operating from 15 locations globally per the STAT News November 2024 profile and the company’s 10-K filings. The team spans computational chemistry, software development, AI/ML, pharma R&D and partnership-economics roles.
  • Capital position (public-company framing): Schrödinger went public on Nasdaq (SDGR) in February 2020 at a $232.2M IPO. Prior to IPO, the company raised approximately $300M+ across pre-IPO rounds led by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Strategic Investment Fund. As a public company, the capital position sits on the balance sheet and is reported via the Schrödinger IR investor page and the 10-K / 10-Q SEC filings. The post-2025 strategic pivot to exit independent clinical development and focus on profitable discovery-stage partnerships is the principal capital-allocation framing.

Methodology & Disclaimer

For metric definitions, source-tier hierarchy, and decline-to-publish rules, see the tracker methodology. Confidence dots (• green / • amber / • red) follow the same convention as the AI Tracker.

Spotted a figure you believe is wrong? Send corrections to info@informationmatters.net.

Information Matters Framework scores are the considered opinion of the IM team — human and AI — applied to publicly-available evidence under a disclosed methodology. They are not statements of fact about the companies scored and they are not investment advice.

Footer

  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · Information Matters

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}